Retaining Wall Disputes in Queensland

If you and your neighbour are having a dispute about who has responsibility for the maintenance, repair or replacement of a retaining wall dividing the properties, this article will give you valuable insight into the legal landscape governing retaining walls in Queensland and what your options may be to resolve the dispute.

What is a retaining wall?

A retaining wall is a structure erected to support an excavated or filled embankment. Under the Building Code of Australia, a retaining wall is classified as a ‘class 10b’ (non-habitable) structure. This means that the construction of a retaining wall (save for limited circumstances) may need to comply with certain building and design requirements (including drainage). A retaining wall may also need to comply with certain planning and zoning controls.

Do I need building and/or planning approval to build a retaining wall?

Generally, if your retaining wall is less than one (1) metre high from the natural ground level, then you do not need planning and/or building approval. However, there are various planning controls and building regulations which may require that you obtain planning and building approval for your specific retaining wall in any event. The legislation for planning and building controls in Queensland (such as the Planning Act 2016 (Qld), the Building Act 1975 (Qld) and the Building Regulation 2006 (Qld)) is not without significant complexity and you should contact your local Council or speak with a suitably qualified lawyer, town planner and/or building certifier for advice specific to your retaining wall before constructing the retaining wall.

For example,

  • a development application for building approval will generally be required where the retaining wall:
    • has a surcharge loading over the zone of influence for the retaining wall (noting that zone of influence, for the retaining wall, means the volume of soil stratum behind the wall that affects the wall’s structural integrity);
    • the total height of the retaining wall and of the fill or cut retained by the retaining wall is more than 1 metre above the natural ground level; or
    • the retaining wall is closer than 1.5 metres to a building structure (for example, a swimming pool or another retaining wall).
  • a development application for planning approval may be triggered depending on the type, nature and location of the retaining wall, in circumstances which include, without limitation, the following scenarios:
    • if the site is located within a character zone or on a character listed property;
    • if the site is affected by a development constraint overlay;
    • if the building or structure does not comply with the design criteria detailed in the residential code or the conditions of a development permit;
    • if the proposed retaining wall does not comply with all siting and boundary setback requirements; or
    • where Council considers that the proposed retaining wall may have an adverse effect or impact on the amenity, or likely amenity, or the character, of the locality or the neighbourhood.

Most clients we see have already “jumped the gun” and constructed a retaining wall without obtaining building and/or planning approvals (if required), without obtaining the neighbours’ consent (if required), without undertaking a boundary identification survey (clearly identifying the common boundary line dividing the neighbouring properties), and without obtaining legal and other professional advice before incurring what may be substantial costs of construction (which makes the task of finding a practical and cost effective solution to the dispute all the more difficult).

Who is responsible for a retaining wall between properties in Queensland?

The law in this area is not simple and many issues need to be considered. For example:

  • in which owner’s lot is the retaining wall located; or
  • is it located squarely along the common boundary line dividing the properties; or
  • is it located substantially in one property and partially in the other (in circumstances where it should not transgress the common boundary, so as to be constituting an encroachment).

More importantly, for what purpose (or for whose benefit) was the retaining wall constructed:

  • was it to hold fill for the neighbour on the higher property (in order to allow them, for example, to level out their land so it is no longer sloping); or
  • was the land cut in by the neighbour on the lower property (in order to allow them to build their house, garage or drive way on a flatter lot); or
  • do the neighbours receive an equal benefit from the retaining wall; or
  • perhaps one neighbour receives a higher benefit than the other, such that the responsibility for the retaining wall ought to be apportioned between the parties; or
  • perhaps one neighbour is causing damage to the retaining wall due to issues emanating from their land (such as, without limitation, trees, branches, underground roots, stormwater overflow, soil surcharges and other issues).

Unlike issues relating to dividing fences and trees (which are governed by legislation known as the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld), which clearly sets out the rights and obligations of the parties in respect of such matters), disputes regarding retaining walls are decided on the basis of broader Judge made legal principles (such as the duty of one neighbour to take reasonable steps to avoid causing reasonably foreseeable harm to the other, the law on land fixtures, and the duty to withhold soil), which are also the law, but are published in cases.

Inevitably, each case will turn on its facts as to which neighbour (and to what extent) has responsibility to maintain, repair or replace the retaining wall.

What evidence will I need to prove my case?

This will depend upon the specific issue(s) affecting your case, but let us say you believe that a severely deteriorated retaining wall is not your responsibility as it is located wholly within your neighbour’s lot and you derive no benefit from the retaining wall as it holds fill and no dug in ground from your property located lower on the natural slope.

In the circumstances, you may need to obtain (but remembering you should first obtain legal advice if you can as it may spare you from incurring unnecessary costs):

  • a copy of any development application and approvals available for the retaining wall by conducting a search of the Council records (which may contain essential information regarding the purpose and the location of the retaining wall);
  • a boundary identification survey from a cadastral surveyor (which will identify the precise location of the retaining wall with respect to the common boundary line);
  • a causation and damage report from an engineer to identify the cause of the deterioration to the retaining wall (which may require your neighbour’s consent);
  • a soil test report from an engineer to determine the depth of fill to cut ratios and measurements of the retaining wall (which may require your neighbour’s consent); and
  • a building quote for the repair or replacement of the retaining wall.

There may well be a need to obtain other professional reports depending on the nature of the issues.

However, at times, it may be possible to resolve the dispute without outlaying thousands of dollars on procuring this evidence, so speaking with your lawyer early in the matter is to be recommended.

What options do I have to resolve the dispute?

There are many options available for resolving a retaining wall dispute, each with varying degrees of complexity, formality and cost. For example:

  • as the first step, you may consider reaching out to the neighbour to agree in respect of the maintenance, repair or replacement obligations of the parties in relation to the retaining wall (without the need for third party intervention). However, you should be wary of dealing with your neighbour in the absence legal representation as you may say or do something which may prejudice your case;
  • invite the parties to attend an external dispute resolution conference (usually free and held without lawyers) with the benefit of a third party mediator whose role is to assist the parties identify a possible solution to the problem (but again, such discussion should be approached with caution and at least with the benefit of legal advice obtained beforehand, so that you understand the strengths and weaknesses of your position, which will instruct the conduct of your negotiations);
  • engage a lawyer to represent you and negotiate on your behalf directly with the neighbour (or the neighbour’s legal representatives) with a view to resolving the matter as quickly and efficiently as possible (and if required, documenting the terms of any agreement in a formal deed);
  • depending on the nature of the issue(s) (and whether, in the context of your case, considered as a whole, it makes practical, commercial, intelligent, short term and long term, sense to undertake the action):
    • in limited cases, refer the matter to Council for investigation;
    • in limited cases, refer the matter to the Queensland Building and Construction Commission for investigation;
    • in limited cases, refer the matter to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal for determination (which disputes are generally resolved without lawyers, but which determinations are nonetheless binding on the parties); or
    • initiate Court proceedings against the neighbour in order to have a Judge finally rule on the matter, with the benefit of legal representation, and an opportunity to recover damages, legal costs and other Orders as the Court may think fit.

Going to Court should only be an option of last resort, but at times, it may not be possible to sensibly negotiate with the other party as they may be unreasonable, unfair or simply uncooperative.

Despite what step you take, what is paramount is that you have a clear strategy and budget in place to see the dispute through to finalisation.

Contact Us

If you need legal advice or assistance with retaining wall rules and regulations, or retaining wall disputes, please contact ADVIILAW today to speak to one of our experienced lawyers. Contact us on 07 3088 7937 or email us at [email protected].


This commentary is of a general nature only, containing some general information for the reader.

It is not intended to be legal advice, nor can it be relied upon as legal advice, as each case will depend upon its own specific facts, matters and circumstances.

To this end, please kindly read our Website Terms including the disclaimer contained therein carefully. Laws, rules and principles may be subject to sudden and unexpected changes and you should always consult a lawyer about your specific circumstances before committing to a course of action.

Based on 100 reviews
powered by Google
Celia McQueen
Celia McQueen
10:38 17 May 21
Alice helped us with the purchase of our first home, and we greatly appreciated her attention to detail and clear... communication throughout the process. We would gladly work with her again or recommend her to others. Thanks Alice!read more
Natalie Dugec
Natalie Dugec
10:55 12 Apr 21
I am extremely grateful for the help I received from ADVIILAW. I required their services for a defamation case and... their services exceeded my expectations. At any time I needed them they were always available to help promptly and did so with a high level of professionalism. Zoran Gelic is great to work with. He explained every step in detail so that I could clearly comprehend and make informed decisions to support my case. This assisted with the positive outcome. If you need a lawyer. I highly recommend ADVIILAWread more
Michael Zarafa
Michael Zarafa
21:56 01 Apr 21
I highly recommend Zoran Gelic as a defamation lawyer. He has a proactive approach and explains everything in detail. I... ended up with a positive outcome and the experience I had with him was fantastic. Keep up the great work Zoran.read more
Rodney McEwan
Rodney McEwan
08:26 31 Mar 21
I can highly recommend Zoran Gelic from Adviilaw who attended to a defamation matter on our behalf. Zoran was extremely... knowledgeable, helpful and professional in resolving this matter. I can highly recommend Zoran Gelic to anyone in need of a lawyer, specifically in relation to defamation law matters.read more
Rin Kim
Rin Kim
06:41 01 Mar 21
Excellent services. I highly recommend AdviiLaw for any commercial legal help.
Carly McClintock
Carly McClintock
10:24 21 Dec 20
Alice was very professional, efficient and knowledgeable with her work, while helping us understand the process in... buying our first home. I highly recommend AdviiLaw for all your conveyancing needs.read more
Bill Vo
Bill Vo
22:03 01 Dec 20
Thank you Alice for your dedication and attention to detail towards our first home loan! Alice came highly recommended... by our broker and from day 1 Alice was very professional and courteous.Alice literally went above and beyond throughout the entire process to ensure the outcome would be in our best interest.I highly recommend to contact AdviiLaw, not just for conveyancing but for other solicitor services too!Thank you again Alice!read more
Next Reviews