Neighbourhood Disputes

Common boundary

Common boundary not agreed.

If you wish to construct a ‘dividing fence’ on your property but you (the ‘owner’) and your neigbour (the ‘adjoining owner’) cannot agree on the position of the common boundary for the purpose of carrying out the fencing work, you may need to use the process contained at section 40 of the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld) (the ‘Act’) to define the position of the common boundary and resolve the dispute.

Notice of Intention

Section 40(2) of the Act provides that an owner may give a written notice to the adjoining owner, or the adjoining owner’s agent, of the owner’s intention to have the common boundary defined by a ‘cadastral surveyor’ engaged by the owner.

Adjoining Owner’s Response

Section 40(3) of the Act then provides that if an adjoining owner is given a notice under subsection 40(2) of the Act, the adjoining owner may, within 1 month after the notice is given—

  • (a) have the common boundary defined by a cadastral surveyor engaged by the adjoining owner and give the owner written advice of the common boundary as defined by the cadastral surveyor; or
  • (b) give the owner written advice of the common boundary as defined by the adjoining owner if the adjoining owner is satisfied of the accurate position of the common boundary.

Right to obtain a cadastral survey

Section 40(4) of the Act states unless an owner who has given notice under subsection 40(2) of the Act receives advice under section 40(3)(a) of the Act, the owner may have the common boundary defined by a cadastral surveyor engaged by the owner.

Costs of cadastral survey

According to section 40(5) of the Act, if the common boundary defined by a cadastral surveyor engaged by the owner under section 40(4) of the Act is in about the same position as the position defined by the adjoining owner in an advice under section 40(3)(b) of the Act, the adjoining owner is not liable for any of the reasonable cost of engaging the cadastral surveyor.

However, section 40(6) of the Act then states that if section 40(5) of the Act does not apply:

  • (a) adjoining owners are each liable for half the reasonable cost of engaging a cadastral surveyor under this section to define the position of the common boundary; and
  • (b) if 1 adjoining owner pays the entire cost, the half payable by the other adjoining owner is recoverable as a debt by the first adjoining owner.

Dividing fences and boundary disputes in Queensland is regulated by the Act, and the law and procedure governing these disputes can be complex. If you are thinking about constructing a dividing fence and you wish to know about your rights and responsibilities to the adjoining owner, or if you have encountered a dispute in relation to a dividing fence or the position of the common boundary, contact AdviiLaw today to speak to an experienced lawyer about your legal position.

This commentary is of a general nature only, containing nothing more than some general information for the reader. It is not intended to be legal advice, nor cannot it be relied upon as legal advice. To this end, please read our Website Terms including the disclaimer contained therein carefully. Laws, rules and principles may be subject to sudden and unexpected changes and you should always consult a lawyer about your specific circumstances.

Your Trusted Lawyers

For a lawyer in Brisbane that you can trust to represent your best interest, contact the team at ADVIILAW. We are proud to be a team of specialist senior lawyers with years of experience in commercial, property and litigation in Australia. Rely on our team for the best advice and legal represntation in Brisbane

Book Appointment
5.0
Based on 100 reviews
powered by Google
Celia McQueen
4 years ago
Alice helped us with the purchase of our first home, and we greatly appreciated her attention to detail and clear commu... read more
Natalie Dugec
4 years ago
I am extremely grateful for the help I received from ADVIILAW. I required their services for a defamation case and the... read more
Michael Zarafa
4 years ago
I highly recommend Zoran Gelic as a defamation lawyer. He has a proactive approach and explains everything in detail. I... read more
Rodney McEwan
4 years ago
I can highly recommend Zoran Gelic from Adviilaw who attended to a defamation matter on our behalf. Zoran was extremely... read more
Rin Kim
4 years ago
Excellent services. I highly recommend AdviiLaw for any commercial legal help.
Carly McClintock
4 years ago
Alice was very professional, efficient and knowledgeable with her work, while helping us understand the process in buyi... read more
Bill Vo
4 years ago
Thank you Alice for your dedication and attention to detail towards our first home loan! Alice came highly recommended ... read more
More reviews
js_loader